Even Lindsay Lohan has to be shocked at this one.

Sure, she’s embarrassed herself beyond comprehension and proven to be a brat who doesn’t take any responsibilities for her actions. But she could at least, like, look good in her mug shot, right? Is that too much for a 21-year-old star to ask?

And, as if this crummy photo, a crumbling personal life and her recent string of arrests weren’t enough, Lindsay Lohan’s week has gotten even worse.

Lohan is apparently being sued by some woman who claims that Lindsay and a bodyguard hit her car a few months ago, then gave her a fake name and number. TMZ reports:

“Signe Dupuy claims that in April 2007 Lindsay Lohan and her main man, Jaz, cut her off in their SUV while she was driving on Fairfax Ave. in L.A. Dupuy says when she got out of the car, Lindsay stopped and glared at her, while Jaz was ‘hostile’ and ‘tried to intimidate’ her. She says they gave her a fake name and number and drove away. Signe tells us this is her last resort, as she has tried to contact Lindsay Lohan several times, even sending her rep a letter. Lindsay’s rep said she did get the letter but “filed it away,” adding “I assumed the letter was sent to [Lindsay’s] lawyers. That’s what they’re paid for.”

Wow. Lindsay’s lawyers are going to be making some serious coin this year, that’s for damn sure. All that reckless drunk driving means big fees! Note to LiLo: The whole fake name thing works better when you’re not a famous movie star.

Also, who the frick is this Jaz?

In any case, the only thing getting crappier reviews than Lindsay Lohan’s rowdy, sometimes naked antics of late is her new movie, I Know Who Killed Me, which debuted in 9th place at the box office, bringing in a paltry $3.4 million. Let’s see what some of the critics say:

Associated Press:
It makes you wonder what Lindsay Lohan was thinking when she said yes to this project… Want to know who killed her? She’s doing it to herself!

THG NOTE: Dina Lohan is helping!

New York Daily News:
Truth is, no review could really do justice to the monumental trashiness of this mess; it really has to be seen to be believed.

(more…)

Pictures of Britney Spears’ ass: Take 12.

Yes, fans, the bad moon has risen once again.

Britney Spears reveals her ample backside in these mostly naked pics, taken months ago on one of her wild nights in New York, but only surfacing as of this week.

Taken just five days prior to the star’s now infamous head shaving incident in February, Britney leaves little to the imagination in these pics, where the singer poses with pals and a tiny thong.

At least (or too bad) she wasn’t wearing no underwear.

Partying at the Club One in New York, the troubled 25-year-old went backstage to chat with the club’s dancers and ended up stripping down to nothing in the process.

Spears’ erratic behavior has been a constant source of entertainment for lucky celebrity gossip purveyors and a cause for concern among those close to her, such as ex-husband, Kevin Federline.

She sure seems like her usual wasted, out-of-it self in these pics.

In any case, Britney Spears certainly seems content to have her picture taken with these two dancers, one of whom sports a thong even tinier than her own. Gross.

Less than a week later, she shocked the world at a tattoo parlor in San Fernando, Calif., when she took a set of clippers to her dome and sheared her locks clean off.

A bald Britney then raged against the machine of celebrity news with an umbrella and checked into rehab later that month. And so on, and so forth.

Rarely does a day go by where we don’t see Britney Spears naked or close to it. While many guys would undoubtedly love to go all J.R. Rotem on that rear end of hers, you gotta admit that the girl needs serious help. Here’s hoping she goes to rehab again and finds it.

Just because Usher Raymond IV and pregnant fiancée Tameka Foster canceled their nuptials abruptly last Saturday, fans shouldn’t count the couple out just yet!

Sad news for a lot of you, we know.

The singer exclusively tells Us Weekly that he still loves Tameka and it’s only a matter of time before he and Foster walk down the aisle.

“As of right now, we don’t have a date, but we will let you know when we do,” said the very handsome Usher.

The couple, who scheduled a July 28 ceremony at the Long Island home of music exec L.A. Reid, called off the wedding at the last minute with no explanation.

Multiple newspaper and celebrity gossip outlets speculated that the cancellation was due to bad blood between Foster and Usher’s mom, Jonetta Patton.

Also rumored to be to blame for the debacle? Reports of Tameka Foster’s criminal past, as well as her resistance to signing a pre-nup.

However, a source close to the couple dismisses the rumors.

“People are just hating,” says the insider.

Earlier today, Foster herself hinted that the real reason they postponed the wedding was due to her pre-term labor, admitting that she and the baby “had a scare.”

According to an Usher source, at noon on Friday, the four-months pregnant Tameka Foster was admitted to St. Vincent’s Medical Center in N.Y. City after suffering cramping. There, “she learned it was just uneasiness brought on by the stress of the wedding.”

At that point, the singer decided to postpone the ceremony. But no worries - when it comes to being a hot couple, Usher and Tameka Foster are solid as a rock.

“Everbody’s fine. Tameka and the baby are fine,” Usher himself told Us Weekly today, after the couple arrived via private plane in New York.

“We’re good. We’re all doing great now,” Tameka Foster said.

Meanwhile, another friend of the couple assures the celebrity news magazine that there will be an “I do” do-over in the near future.

“There will be a second wedding ceremony,” a pal of Usher’s dished. “This is just a postponement. They are very much in love.”

Usher, 28, and Foster, 37, got engaged in January after about a year of dating. The couple announced Foster’s pregnancy in June. The baby will be Usher’s first child, whereas Foster has three children from a previous marriage.